PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 12.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CSB has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 9.70%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.


CSB

1D
0.91%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.26%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
9.70%

VBR

1D
0.86%
1M
1.86%
YTD
12.11%
6M
13.63%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
9.49%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
12.11%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and VBR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.88

The correlation between CSB and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
VBR

Financial Services

26.5%
17.6%

Utilities

22.0%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
12.4%

Energy

11.5%
5.2%

Industrials

8.5%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.0%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
6.3%

Technology

1.2%
10.6%

Healthcare

0.4%
7.9%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Financial Services

CSB
26.5%
VBR
17.6%

Utilities

CSB
22.0%
VBR
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.0%
VBR
12.4%

Energy

CSB
11.5%
VBR
5.2%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
VBR
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.4%
VBR
4.0%

Communication Services

CSB
3.6%
VBR
2.5%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.4%
VBR
6.3%

Technology

CSB
1.2%
VBR
10.6%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
VBR
7.9%

Real Estate

CSB

-

VBR
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSBVBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.84

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.70

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.10

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.15

10.94

-2.80

CSB vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSBVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.84

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.41

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.49

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.42

+0.03

Drawdowns

CSB vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-61.98%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-8.85%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-24.19%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-24.19%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-45.28%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

0.00%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-8.27%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.50%

-0.03%

Volatility

CSB vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.62%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

4.07%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

10.46%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

15.17%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

19.77%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

21.74%

-0.43%

CSB vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than VBR's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.23%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.75%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CSB and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBR has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to CSB (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.58% vs 9.70% for CSB. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.75% for VBR.

CSB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer