PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAW vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAW vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VAW having a 11.07% return and VYM slightly higher at 11.51%. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.46%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.


VAW

1D
-1.83%
1M
0.83%
YTD
11.07%
6M
9.68%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
10.46%

VYM

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.26%
YTD
11.51%
6M
10.83%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
11.07%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
11.51%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VYM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.81

The correlation between VAW and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VAW vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAW
VYM

Basic Materials

90.1%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
6.6%

Industrials

1.1%
11.8%

Healthcare

0.5%
12.2%

Technology

0.1%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
8.0%

Energy

0.0%
9.1%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

19.9%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

5.4%

Basic Materials

VAW
90.1%
VYM
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VAW
8.3%
VYM
6.6%

Industrials

VAW
1.1%
VYM
11.8%

Healthcare

VAW
0.5%
VYM
12.2%

Technology

VAW
0.1%
VYM
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

VAW
0.0%
VYM
8.0%

Energy

VAW
0.0%
VYM
9.1%

Communication Services

VAW

-

VYM
3.4%

Financial Services

VAW

-

VYM
19.9%

Real Estate

VAW

-

VYM
0.0%

Utilities

VAW

-

VYM
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAW vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAWVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.61

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

13.43

-8.53

VAW vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAWVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-56.98%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-6.69%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-14.46%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-15.84%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-35.21%

-5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-1.28%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-7.18%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

1.80%

+2.43%

Volatility

VAW vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAWVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

3.02%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

7.64%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

10.39%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

13.93%

+5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

16.32%

+4.91%

VAW vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAW vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than VYM's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.39%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.30%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAW and VYM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.98% vs 10.46% for VAW. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VAW.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.39% for VAW.

VAW is categorized as Materials, while VYM is Dividend. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAW and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAW and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer