PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAMO vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAMO vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.


VAMO

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.15%
6M
4.57%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
5.64%

TAIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-8.73%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAMO vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
3.15%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%5.44%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-6.17%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and TAIL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

-0.35

The correlation between VAMO and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (all time) to -0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAMO vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAMO
TAIL

Financial Services

38.8%
11.8%

Energy

34.0%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

33.5%
10.1%

Industrials

21.4%
8.3%

Healthcare

17.5%
8.5%

Technology

8.3%
35.6%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.9%

Communication Services

5.0%
11.2%

Utilities

1.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

VAMO
38.8%
TAIL
11.8%

Energy

VAMO
34.0%
TAIL
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VAMO
33.5%
TAIL
10.1%

Industrials

VAMO
21.4%
TAIL
8.3%

Healthcare

VAMO
17.5%
TAIL
8.5%

Technology

VAMO
8.3%
TAIL
35.6%

Basic Materials

VAMO
7.3%
TAIL
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VAMO
6.5%
TAIL
4.9%

Communication Services

VAMO
5.0%
TAIL
11.2%

Utilities

VAMO
1.6%
TAIL
2.4%

Real Estate

VAMO

-

TAIL
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAMO vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAMO vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAMOTAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.83

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

-0.80

+4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

-2.01

+11.48

VAMO vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAMO and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAMOTAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

-1.03

+2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.57

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.48

+0.73

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAMOTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-52.36%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-10.95%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-20.65%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-38.44%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-51.56%

+48.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-29.12%

+19.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

4.35%

-2.43%

Volatility

VAMO vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that VAMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAMOTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

0.86%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

6.45%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

8.51%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

14.90%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

14.94%

+3.15%

VAMO vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAMO vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.49%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%0.00%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.63%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAMO and TAIL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAMO has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs TAIL's -52.36%.

On 5-year performance, VAMO leads with 8.12% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VAMO has performed better with a 8.12% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.

VAMO is categorized as Momentum, while TAIL is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 0.59% for TAIL.

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAMO and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer