VAMO vs. PSL
VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) and PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. VAMO is actively managed, while PSL is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAMO returned 5.64%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for PSL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAMO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PSL.
Performance
VAMO vs. PSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than PSL's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VAMO has underperformed PSL with an annualized return of 5.64%, while PSL has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return.
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
PSL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
VAMO vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 3.15% | 16.51% | 6.11% | 5.58% | 8.55% | 32.16% | -4.92% | -4.63% | -11.43% | 3.82% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 9.10% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAMO and PSL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015 | 0.43 |
VAMO vs. PSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAMO
PSL
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
VAMO
PSL
Energy
VAMO
PSL
-
Consumer Cyclical
VAMO
PSL
Industrials
VAMO
PSL
Healthcare
VAMO
PSL
-
Technology
VAMO
PSL
-
Basic Materials
VAMO
PSL
-
Consumer Defensive
VAMO
PSL
Communication Services
VAMO
PSL
-
Utilities
VAMO
PSL
-
Real Estate
VAMO
-
PSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAMO vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank
VAMO
PSL
VAMO vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAMO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.00 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | -0.08 | +3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | -0.17 | +9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAMO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | -0.08 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.24 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
VAMO vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, roughly equal to the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and PSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAMO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.84% | -41.58% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.55% | -13.64% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.61% | -13.64% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -22.35% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.84% | -34.67% | -7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -6.41% | +3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -5.82% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 6.09% | -4.17% |
Volatility
VAMO vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) is 2.97%, while Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that VAMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAMO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.29% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 8.51% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 12.80% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 15.15% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 16.50% | +1.59% |
VAMO vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VAMO vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison
VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than PSL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAMO and PSL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSL has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs PSL's -41.58%.
On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 7.88% vs 5.64% for VAMO. On fees, PSL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 7.88% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 0.60% for PSL.
VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAMO and PSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer