PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAMO vs. DVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAMO vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.


VAMO

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.15%
6M
4.57%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
5.64%

DVOL

1D
0.41%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.02%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAMO vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
3.15%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-14.06%
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
1.61%4.30%24.84%5.39%-16.10%30.08%11.15%26.10%-9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and DVOL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.38

The correlation between VAMO and DVOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAMO vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAMO
DVOL

Financial Services

38.8%
18.8%

Energy

34.0%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

33.5%
9.4%

Industrials

21.4%
16.6%

Healthcare

17.5%
3.7%

Technology

8.3%
4.7%

Basic Materials

7.3%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
8.2%

Communication Services

5.0%
3.6%

Utilities

1.6%
3.0%

Real Estate

-

12.1%

Financial Services

VAMO
38.8%
DVOL
18.8%

Energy

VAMO
34.0%
DVOL
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VAMO
33.5%
DVOL
9.4%

Industrials

VAMO
21.4%
DVOL
16.6%

Healthcare

VAMO
17.5%
DVOL
3.7%

Technology

VAMO
8.3%
DVOL
4.7%

Basic Materials

VAMO
7.3%
DVOL
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

VAMO
6.5%
DVOL
8.2%

Communication Services

VAMO
5.0%
DVOL
3.6%

Utilities

VAMO
1.6%
DVOL
3.0%

Real Estate

VAMO

-

DVOL
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAMO vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAMO vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAMODVOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.02

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

0.08

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

0.30

+9.17

VAMO vs. DVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the DVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAMO and DVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAMODVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.07

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.50

-0.26

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than DVOL's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and DVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAMODVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-38.26%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-9.82%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-11.66%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-24.65%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-4.85%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-7.17%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.87%

-0.95%

Volatility

VAMO vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAMODVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.91%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

9.35%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

11.79%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

14.40%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

17.72%

+0.37%

VAMO vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAMO vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than DVOL's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.68%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.63%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAMO and DVOL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAMO has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs DVOL's -38.26%.

On 5-year performance, VAMO leads with 8.12% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, DVOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VAMO has performed better with a 8.12% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

DVOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 0.60% for DVOL.

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAMO and DVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer