UYLD vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UYLD returned 5.12% vs 47.83% for GSIB. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

UYLD vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 13.98% return.

UYLD

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.39%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYLD vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF	2.03%	5.36%	6.10%	0.34%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between UYLD and GSIB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.12

The correlation between UYLD and GSIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UYLD vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYLD

UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYLD vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UYLD	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.03	2.59	+5.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	22.06	3.58	+18.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.49	1.43	+3.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	37.30	3.28	+34.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	226.63	11.54	+215.09

UYLD vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYLD Sharpe Ratio is 8.03, which is higher than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYLD and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UYLD vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum GSIB drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYLD	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-17.71%	+17.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.14%	-13.90%	+13.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-2.05%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	3.94%	-3.92%

Volatility

UYLD vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.36%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYLD	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	5.59%	-5.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.50%	14.41%	-13.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64%	17.63%	-16.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.00%	18.51%	-17.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.00%	18.51%	-17.51%

UYLD vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

UYLD vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF	5.03%	5.07%	4.97%	5.92%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYLD and GSIB in my portfolio?

UYLD and GSIB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYLD or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to UYLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, UYLD or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 47.83% vs 5.12% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYLD or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 47.83% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYLD or GSIB?

UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GSIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYLD or GSIB?

UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between UYLD and GSIB?

UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.