UYLD vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UYLD returned 5.89%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.53% return.

UYLD

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 5.18%
• 3Y*: 5.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 6.21%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF	1.91%	5.36%	6.10%	6.08%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.53%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between UYLD and CLOZ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023	0.01

Return for Risk

UYLD vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYLD

UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UYLD	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	8.00	1.81	+6.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	21.91	2.31	+19.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.35	1.46	+2.89
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	38.06	1.60	+36.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	225.76	5.31	+220.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYLD Sharpe Ratio is 8.00, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYLD and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UYLD	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.00	1.81	+6.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.98	2.77	+3.22

Drawdowns

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYLD	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-5.32%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.14%	-3.90%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.54%	-5.32%	+4.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.12%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.38%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	1.17%	-1.15%

Volatility

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.38%, while Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYLD	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.38%	0.42%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.50%	3.13%	-2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65%	3.45%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.00%	3.80%	-2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.00%	3.80%	-2.80%

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UYLD vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than CLOZ's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.39%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF	5.03%	5.07%	4.97%	5.92%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYLD and CLOZ in my portfolio?

UYLD and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYLD or CLOZ?

CLOZ has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to UYLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, UYLD or CLOZ?

On 3-year performance, CLOZ leads with 10.62% vs 5.89% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYLD or CLOZ?

Over the 3-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYLD or CLOZ?

UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYLD or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.39%, compared with 5.03% for UYLD.

What is the main difference between UYLD and CLOZ?

UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.00 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.