UYG vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 28, 2026

UYG (ProShares Ultra Financials) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UYG is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, UYG returned 1.43% vs 1579.84% for INTW. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

UYG vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -6.60% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 691.84% return.

UYG

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: -6.60%
• 6M: -9.22%
• 1Y: 1.43%
• 3Y*: 30.40%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 18.50%

INTW

• 1D: -7.93%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 691.84%
• 6M: 720.56%
• 1Y: 1,579.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYG vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials	-6.60%	7.23%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	691.84%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between UYG and INTW is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.21

The correlation between UYG and INTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UYG vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UYG	INTW
Financial Services	98.0%	-
Technology	1.8%	66.7%
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UYG vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYG

UYG Risk / Return Rank: 10
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYG vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UYG	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	10.86	-10.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	4.87	-4.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.61	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	33.01	-32.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.15	74.69	-74.54

UYG vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 10.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYG and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UYG vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYG	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.90%	-60.58%	-37.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.91%	-49.34%	+20.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.79%	-18.50%	+6.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.19%	-29.53%	-33.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.34%	21.76%	-9.42%

Volatility

UYG vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) is 7.98%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 56.16%. This indicates that UYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYG	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	56.16%	-48.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.38%	119.44%	-97.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.93%	149.96%	-121.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.12%	148.44%	-112.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.90%	148.44%	-107.54%

UYG vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UYG vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.50%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials	12.50%	11.72%	0.51%	0.79%	0.77%	9.39%	0.66%	0.90%	1.28%	0.56%	0.76%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYG and INTW in my portfolio?

UYG and INTW have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYG or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (56.16%) compared to UYG (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, UYG or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1579.84% vs 1.43% for UYG. On fees, UYG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UYG has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYG or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1579.84% return vs 1.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYG or INTW?

UYG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYG or INTW?

UYG has the higher dividend yield at 12.50%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between UYG and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYG and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.86 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.