PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UXRP vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UXRP vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -73.83% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.


UXRP

1D
-1.74%
1M
-31.36%
YTD
-73.83%
6M
-75.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
-4.34%
YTD
20.23%
6M
19.92%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXRP vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UXRP and FAAR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UXRP vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXRP vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UXRPFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

UXRP vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UXRP vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.02%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UXRPFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.02%

-18.03%

-77.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.85%

-5.43%

-90.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.44%

-7.82%

-64.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

UXRP vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UXRPFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.99%

13.37%

+135.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.99%

12.95%

+136.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.99%

11.53%

+137.46%

UXRP vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

UXRP vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.57%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
UXRP
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UXRP and FAAR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FAAR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FAAR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.

UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.95% for FAAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UXRP and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer