PortfoliosLab logo
FAAR vs. BCI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAAR and BCI is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FAAR vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAAR:

-0.22

BCI:

0.00

Sortino Ratio

FAAR:

-0.10

BCI:

0.40

Omega Ratio

FAAR:

0.99

BCI:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

FAAR:

-0.09

BCI:

0.12

Martin Ratio

FAAR:

-0.46

BCI:

0.51

Ulcer Index

FAAR:

3.45%

BCI:

5.70%

Daily Std Dev

FAAR:

11.79%

BCI:

13.53%

Max Drawdown

FAAR:

-18.03%

BCI:

-32.69%

Current Drawdown

FAAR:

-14.30%

BCI:

-15.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 5.06% return.


FAAR

YTD

-3.63%

1M

1.36%

6M

-1.92%

1Y

-2.56%

3Y*

-3.69%

5Y*

5.39%

10Y*

N/A

BCI

YTD

5.06%

1M

0.10%

6M

6.63%

1Y

0.06%

3Y*

-3.95%

5Y*

12.75%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAAR vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAAR vs. BCI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAAR is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAAR is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAAR is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAAR is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAAR is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAAR is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BCI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCI is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCI is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCI is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCI is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCI is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCI is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAAR vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FAAR Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAAR and BCI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FAAR vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than BCI's 3.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
3.41%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
3.14%3.30%3.93%19.98%19.43%0.68%1.47%1.13%5.02%

Drawdowns

FAAR vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and BCI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FAAR vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) is 2.66%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that FAAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...