PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UXJL vs. BFLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UXJL vs. BFLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than BFLB's 6.52% return.


UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFLB

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.53%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJL vs. BFLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UXJL and BFLB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UXJL vs. BFLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UXJL vs. BFLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UXJLBFLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.87

1.71

+0.16

Drawdowns

UXJL vs. BFLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than BFLB's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and BFLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UXJLBFLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-5.14%

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.08%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-0.77%

-0.74%

Volatility

UXJL vs. BFLB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UXJLBFLBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

7.76%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

7.76%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

7.76%

+6.14%

UXJL vs. BFLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BFLB's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

UXJL vs. BFLB - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXJL nor BFLB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, UXJL and BFLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BFLB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFLB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

UXJL and BFLB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BufferLABS. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.79% for BFLB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UXJL and BFLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer