UXJL vs. BFLB
UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and BFLB (BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BFLB.
Performance
UXJL vs. BFLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than BFLB's 6.52% return.
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFLB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL vs. BFLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 1.11% |
BFLB BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF | 6.52% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXJL and BFLB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXJL vs. BFLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXJL | BFLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.87 | 1.71 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
UXJL vs. BFLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than BFLB's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and BFLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXJL | BFLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -5.14% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.08% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -0.77% | -0.74% |
Volatility
UXJL vs. BFLB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXJL | BFLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 7.76% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 7.76% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 7.76% | +6.14% |
UXJL vs. BFLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BFLB's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXJL vs. BFLB - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXJL nor BFLB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, UXJL and BFLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BFLB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFLB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
UXJL and BFLB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BufferLABS. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.79% for BFLB.
Find the right allocation for UXJL and BFLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer