UXJL vs. SMAX
UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and SMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SMAX.
Performance
UXJL vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | 3.09% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXJL and SMAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXJL vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank
UXJL
SMAX
UXJL vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXJL | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.87 | 2.01 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
UXJL vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and SMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXJL | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -3.90% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.09% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -0.40% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility
UXJL vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXJL | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 2.67% | +11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 3.67% | +10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 3.67% | +10.23% |
UXJL vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXJL vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison
UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 0.27% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXJL and SMAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.50% for SMAX.
Find the right allocation for UXJL and SMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer