UXJL vs. MSOO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MSOO.

Performance

UXJL vs. MSOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly higher than MSOO's -26.25% return.

UXJL

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: 9.61%
• YTD: 11.83%
• 1Y: 23.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.68%

MSOO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: -20.14%
• YTD: -26.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$6.49K
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	$17.49K	$19.76K	$22.74K

UXJL vs. MSOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.83%	6.66%
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	-26.25%	-61.39%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJL and MSOO is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

UXJL vs. MSOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UXJL

UXJL Risk / Return Rank: 61
UXJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UXJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UXJL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
UXJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
UXJL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MSOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UXJL vs. MSOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UXJL	MSOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.25	—	—

Drawdowns

UXJL vs. MSOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum MSOO drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and MSOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJL	MSOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-73.17%	+62.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-71.52%	+70.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-51.94%	+50.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UXJL	MSOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	65.04%	-50.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	65.04%	-50.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	65.04%	-50.54%

UXJL vs. MSOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXJL vs. MSOO - Dividend Comparison

UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	2.20%	1.63%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJL and MSOO in my portfolio?

UXJL and MSOO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UXJL or MSOO?

On fees, MSOO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJL or MSOO?

MSOO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJL or MSOO?

MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.

What is the main difference between UXJL and MSOO?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.78% for MSOO.