UXI vs. QLD
UXI (ProShares Ultra Industrials) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UXI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index (200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UXI returned 19.32%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UXI vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXI achieves a 21.82% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UXI has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 19.32%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.
UXI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 21.82%
- 6M
- 23.67%
- 1Y
- 38.90%
- 3Y*
- 35.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 19.32%
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
UXI vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 21.82% | 28.84% | 26.48% | 27.34% | -32.90% | 34.64% | 16.37% | 67.44% | -28.13% | 51.81% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXI and QLD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.72 |
The correlation between UXI and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UXI vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UXI
QLD
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
UXI
QLD
Utilities
UXI
QLD
Technology
UXI
QLD
Consumer Cyclical
UXI
QLD
Basic Materials
UXI
-
QLD
Communication Services
UXI
-
QLD
Consumer Defensive
UXI
-
QLD
Energy
UXI
-
QLD
Financial Services
UXI
-
QLD
Healthcare
UXI
-
QLD
Real Estate
UXI
-
QLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXI vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UXI
QLD
UXI vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UXI | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.42 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 11.92 | -5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXI | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.70 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.81 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.60 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
UXI vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXI drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXI and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXI | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -83.13% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.59% | -25.13% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.42% | -42.29% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.25% | -63.68% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.48% | -63.68% | -2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -0.53% | -6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -18.17% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 7.20% | -0.63% |
Volatility
UXI vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that UXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXI | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 8.90% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.69% | 24.08% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.91% | 31.85% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.90% | 44.74% | -8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.42% | 44.56% | -5.14% |
UXI vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UXI and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UXI vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 0.67% | 0.90% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.29% | 0.58% | 0.37% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXI and QLD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXI has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXI dropped -89.01% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 19.32% for UXI. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 19.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UXI and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
UXI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index (200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXI and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer