UX vs. LIT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).

UX and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UX is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jan 28, 2025. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.

Performance

UX vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UX vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	2.86%	15.76%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	14.63%	60.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 14.63% return.

UX

• 1D: 4.92%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 6M: -0.22%
• 1Y: 36.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIT

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 31.14%
• 1Y: 92.83%
• 3Y*: 6.29%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 14.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UX vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UX and LIT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

UX

Roundhill Uranium ETF

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Return for Risk

UX vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UX

UX Risk / Return Rank: 53
UX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
UX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 96
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UX vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UX	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	2.70	-1.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	3.28	-1.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.44	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	5.00	-3.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	19.45	-15.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UX vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UX and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UX	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	2.70	-1.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.24	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between UX and LIT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UX vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than LIT's 0.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	1.44%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.42%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Drawdowns

UX vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UX	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.72%	-65.91%	+42.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.72%	-17.61%	-6.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.78%	-19.86%	+3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.07%	-33.90%	+24.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.61%	4.63%	+4.98%

Volatility

UX vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 12.49% and 11.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UX	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.49%	11.99%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.48%	24.73%	+2.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.90%	34.57%	+3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.52%	31.68%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.52%	30.50%	+7.02%