UX vs. URA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).

UX and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UX is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jan 28, 2025. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.

Performance

UX vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UX vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	2.86%	15.76%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	13.34%	57.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 13.34% return.

UX

• 1D: 4.92%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 6M: -0.22%
• 1Y: 36.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: 6.93%
• 1M: -10.88%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 121.39%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: 24.65%
• 10Y*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UX vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

UX

Roundhill Uranium ETF

URA

Global X Uranium ETF

Return for Risk

UX vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UX

UX Risk / Return Rank: 53
UX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
UX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 93
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UX vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UX	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	2.48	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.97	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.37	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	4.21	-2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	10.13	-6.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UX vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UX and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UX	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	2.48	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	-0.06	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between UX and URA is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UX vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than URA's 4.30% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	1.44%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.30%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Drawdowns

UX vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UX	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.72%	-93.54%	+69.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.72%	-28.43%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.78%	-45.04%	+28.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.07%	-75.40%	+66.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.61%	11.82%	-2.21%

Volatility

UX vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) is 12.49%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that UX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UX	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.49%	16.31%	-3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.48%	38.54%	-11.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.90%	49.21%	-11.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.52%	43.00%	-5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.52%	37.23%	+0.29%