UWMC vs. PLTR
UWMC (UWM Holdings Corporation) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. UWMC operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, UWMC returned -20.26%/yr vs 34.48%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UWMC vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UWMC achieves a -50.18% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's -34.35% return.
UWMC
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -31.29%
- YTD
- -50.18%
- 6M
- -52.87%
- 1Y
- -46.27%
- 3Y*
- -23.14%
- 5Y*
- -20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- -34.35%
- 6M
- -39.89%
- 1Y
- -16.60%
- 3Y*
- 102.61%
- 5Y*
- 34.48%
- 10Y*
- —
UWMC vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWMC UWM Holdings Corporation | -50.18% | -19.30% | -13.04% | 132.11% | -38.03% | -37.29% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -34.35% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UWMC and PLTR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UWMC and PLTR has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
UWMC:
$3.25B
PLTR:
$300.03B
UWMC:
$0.37
PLTR:
$0.89
UWMC:
5.47
PLTR:
131.32
UWMC:
0.37
PLTR:
57.35
UWMC:
2.03
PLTR:
35.51
UWMC:
$3.10B
PLTR:
$5.22B
UWMC:
$1.79B
PLTR:
$4.39B
UWMC:
$1.03B
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UWMC vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
UWMC
PLTR
UWMC vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UWMC | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.38 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | -0.75 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UWMC vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWMC drawdown since its inception was -74.48%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWMC and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UWMC | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.48% | -84.62% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.27% | -43.67% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.48% | -43.67% | -30.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.48% | -79.14% | +4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.48% | -43.67% | -30.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -40.26% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.33% | 22.06% | +9.27% |
Volatility
UWMC vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is 13.67%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 19.16%. This indicates that UWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UWMC | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.67% | 19.16% | -5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.28% | 38.60% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.84% | 51.49% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 65.59% | -14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.00% | 69.73% | -18.73% |
Dividends
UWMC vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
UWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.70%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UWMC UWM Holdings Corporation | 19.70% | 9.13% | 6.81% | 5.59% | 12.08% | 6.76% |
Financials
UWMC vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UWM Holdings Corporation and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UWMC vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
UWMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UWM Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 901.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
UWMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UWM Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 901.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
UWMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UWM Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 170.37M and revenue of 901.43M, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UWMC and PLTR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (19.16%) compared to UWMC (13.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWMC dropped -74.48% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UWMC and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer