UWMC vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UWMC or VONG.
Correlation
The correlation between UWMC and VONG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UWMC vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UWMC:
0.01
VONG:
1.67
UWMC:
0.33
VONG:
2.22
UWMC:
1.04
VONG:
1.30
UWMC:
0.01
VONG:
2.25
UWMC:
0.03
VONG:
8.51
UWMC:
20.98%
VONG:
3.48%
UWMC:
42.58%
VONG:
17.69%
UWMC:
-76.27%
VONG:
-32.72%
UWMC:
-38.49%
VONG:
-0.49%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UWMC achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 3.73% return.
UWMC
8.86%
4.07%
-27.24%
-1.28%
N/A
N/A
VONG
3.73%
2.32%
14.80%
28.62%
17.88%
16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UWMC vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UWMC
VONG
UWMC vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UWMC vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
UWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than VONG's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWMC UWM Holdings Corporation | 6.26% | 6.81% | 5.59% | 12.08% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
UWMC vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWMC drawdown since its inception was -76.27%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWMC and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UWMC vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 5.13%. This indicates that UWMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.