PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWMC vs. F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UWMC vs. F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) and Ford Motor Company (F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWMC achieves a -30.30% return, which is significantly lower than F's 26.00% return.


UWMC

1D
-1.33%
1M
-18.85%
YTD
-30.30%
6M
-44.73%
1Y
-20.62%
3Y*
-10.85%
5Y*
-13.32%
10Y*

F

1D
-2.89%
1M
37.66%
YTD
26.00%
6M
27.55%
1Y
69.80%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UWMC vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UWMC
UWM Holdings Corporation
-30.30%-19.30%-13.04%132.11%-38.03%-28.60%
F
Ford Motor Company
26.00%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%74.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UWMC and F is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UWMC:

$4.75B

F:

$65.75B

EPS

UWMC:

$0.37

F:

-$1.52

PS Ratio

UWMC:

0.55

F:

0.34

PB Ratio

UWMC:

2.97

F:

1.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

UWMC:

$3.10B

F:

$189.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UWMC:

$1.79B

F:

$17.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

UWMC:

$1.03B

F:

$9.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UWMC vs. F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWMC
UWMC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWMC vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UWMCFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.39

1.90

-2.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

2.91

-3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.35

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

2.83

-3.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

7.65

-8.54

UWMC vs. F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the F Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWMC and F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UWMCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

1.90

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.14

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.16

-0.40

Drawdowns

UWMC vs. F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWMC drawdown since its inception was -68.67%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWMC and F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.67%

-97.07%

+28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.98%

-22.31%

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.91%

-36.51%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.67%

-58.62%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.31%

-28.74%

-35.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.15%

-44.70%

+7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.63%

8.27%

+19.36%

Volatility

UWMC vs. F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is 9.41%, while Ford Motor Company (F) has a volatility of 21.40%. This indicates that UWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UWMCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

21.40%

-11.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.71%

28.92%

+9.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.75%

37.13%

+16.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.60%

39.49%

+11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.61%

37.46%

+13.15%

Dividends

UWMC vs. F - Dividend Comparison

UWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.47%, more than F's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
3.72%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
UWMC
UWM Holdings Corporation
13.47%9.13%6.81%5.59%12.08%6.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UWMC vs. F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UWM Holdings Corporation and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
901.43M
43.25B
(UWMC) Total Revenue
(F) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UWMC vs. F - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UWM Holdings Corporation and Ford Motor Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
18.4%
Portfolio components
UWMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UWM Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 901.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

F - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

UWMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UWM Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 901.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

F - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

UWMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UWM Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 170.37M and revenue of 901.43M, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

F - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UWMC and F have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

F has higher volatility (21.40%) compared to UWMC (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWMC dropped -68.67% vs F's -97.07%.

F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UWMC and F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer