UWM vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
UWM and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
UWM vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UWM vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.73% | 13.59% | 11.32% | 22.62% | -43.69% | -3.26% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.22% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.
UWM
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 43.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UWM vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UWM vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
UWM
XDSQ
UWM vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UWM | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.27 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.21 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 5.87 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UWM | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.61 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between UWM and XDSQ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UWM vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 1.02% | 1.05% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.27% | 0.23% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UWM vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UWM | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.21% | -26.06% | -62.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.48% | -12.18% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -6.46% | -19.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -5.08% | -25.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 2.50% | +5.33% |
Volatility
UWM vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a higher volatility of 14.60% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that UWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UWM | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.60% | 5.68% | +8.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.75% | 9.63% | +19.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.23% | 17.99% | +28.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.04% | 15.32% | +29.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.99% | 15.32% | +30.67% |