PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWM vs. UGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UWM vs. UGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 36.19% return, which is significantly higher than UGE's 18.88% return. Over the past 10 years, UWM has outperformed UGE with an annualized return of 12.82%, while UGE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.80% annualized return.


UWM

1D
1.73%
1M
5.10%
YTD
36.19%
6M
28.56%
1Y
83.09%
3Y*
23.58%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
12.82%

UGE

1D
1.08%
1M
1.29%
YTD
18.88%
6M
15.24%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UWM vs. UGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
36.19%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
18.88%-5.21%16.40%2.38%-46.78%42.44%56.64%58.28%-30.14%32.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and UGE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between UWM and UGE has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UWM vs. UGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UWM
UGE

Technology

19.1%

-

Industrials

17.8%

-

Healthcare

16.3%

-

Financial Services

15.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
1.0%

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
99.0%

Technology

UWM
19.1%
UGE

-

Industrials

UWM
17.8%
UGE

-

Healthcare

UWM
16.3%
UGE

-

Financial Services

UWM
15.5%
UGE

-

Consumer Cyclical

UWM
7.9%
UGE
1.0%

Real Estate

UWM
5.9%
UGE

-

Energy

UWM
5.4%
UGE

-

Basic Materials

UWM
4.7%
UGE

-

Utilities

UWM
2.7%
UGE

-

Communication Services

UWM
2.5%
UGE

-

Consumer Defensive

UWM
2.2%
UGE
99.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UWM vs. UGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UGE
UGE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWM vs. UGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UWMUGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.07

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.38

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.74

0.67

+11.07

UWM vs. UGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the UGE Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and UGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UWM vs. UGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than UGE's maximum drawdown of -71.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and UGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMUGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-71.36%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.28%

-18.95%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.79%

-24.80%

-24.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.62%

-56.55%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.46%

-57.14%

-14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-32.84%

+32.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.84%

-18.75%

-12.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

10.64%

-4.11%

Volatility

UWM vs. UGE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) at 8.67%. This indicates that UWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UWMUGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

8.67%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.35%

20.01%

+8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.11%

25.39%

+13.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.18%

31.37%

+13.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.16%

33.11%

+13.05%

UWM vs. UGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UWM and UGE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UWM vs. UGE - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than UGE's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
2.05%2.54%1.43%1.20%0.74%0.20%0.41%0.86%0.76%0.68%0.76%0.60%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.76%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


UWM and UGE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UWM has higher volatility (14.29%) compared to UGE (8.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs UGE's -71.36%.

On 10-year performance, UWM leads with 12.82% vs 8.80% for UGE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UGE has been the lower-risk option at 8.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UWM has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UWM and UGE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.76% for UWM.

UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%), while UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%).

UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UWM and UGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer