UWM vs. IFED
UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UWM tracks the Russell 2000 Index (200%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UWM returned 22.09%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for IFED. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
UWM vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 38.52% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's 6.57% return.
UWM
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- YTD
- 38.52%
- 1Y
- 76.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
IFED
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $137.39K | $84.48K | $45.67K | |
| $17.74M | $17.63M | $19.86M |
UWM vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 38.52% | 13.59% | 11.32% | 22.62% | -43.69% | 1.87% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 6.57% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between UWM and IFED is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UWM and IFED has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UWM vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
UWM
IFED
UWM vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.13 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 0.56 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 1.73 | +10.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UWM vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.21% | -22.36% | -65.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.28% | -20.18% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.79% | -22.36% | -27.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -10.51% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.64% | -5.85% | -24.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 6.47% | +0.04% |
Volatility
UWM vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is 8.22%, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a volatility of 24.37%. This indicates that UWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 24.37% | -16.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.96% | 28.13% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.36% | 29.53% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.94% | 22.60% | +22.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.03% | 22.60% | +23.43% |
UWM vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UWM vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.81% | 1.05% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.27% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UWM and IFED have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFED has higher volatility (24.37%) compared to UWM (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, UWM leads with 22.09% vs 18.28% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 8.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UWM has performed better with a 22.09% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UWM.
UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UWM and 0.45% for IFED.
UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UWM and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer