UWM vs. DBE
UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UWM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (200%), while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UWM returned 11.92%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for DBE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
UWM vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 38.49% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 68.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UWM having a 11.92% annualized return and DBE not far behind at 11.45%.
UWM
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 1Y
- 66.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
DBE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 65.69%
- YTD
- 68.39%
- 1Y
- 57.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
UWM vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 38.49% | 13.59% | 11.32% | 22.62% | -43.69% | 23.91% | 16.57% | 48.62% | -25.89% | 26.92% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 68.39% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 19.72% | -12.95% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UWM and DBE is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007 | 0.27 |
The correlation between UWM and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UWM vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
UWM
DBE
UWM vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UWM | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.34 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 7.00 | +3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UWM vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, roughly equal to the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UWM | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.21% | -86.69% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.28% | -24.72% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.79% | -24.72% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.62% | -38.74% | -22.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.46% | -60.84% | -10.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -36.07% | +32.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -57.19% | +26.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 8.26% | -1.73% |
Volatility
UWM vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is 7.30%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that UWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UWM | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 11.68% | -4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 32.70% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.44% | 35.99% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.04% | 29.88% | +15.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.99% | 28.39% | +17.60% |
UWM vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
UWM vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than DBE's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.29% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.81% | 1.05% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.27% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UWM and DBE have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to UWM (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 10-year performance, UWM leads with 11.92% vs 11.45% for DBE. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 7.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UWM has performed better with a 11.92% return vs 11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UWM.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.81% for UWM.
UWM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UWM and 0.78% for DBE.
UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UWM and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer