PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVIX vs. NVDQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVIX achieves a -37.30% return, which is significantly lower than NVDQ's -28.10% return.


UVIX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-22.34%
YTD
-37.30%
6M
-39.53%
1Y
-84.89%
3Y*
-80.89%
5Y*
10Y*

NVDQ

1D
1.00%
1M
11.23%
YTD
-28.10%
6M
-26.43%
1Y
-61.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UVIX
2x Long VIX Futures ETF
-37.30%-83.21%-75.24%-64.37%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
-28.10%-74.63%-93.80%-28.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UVIX and NVDQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVIX vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVIX
UVIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
UVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UVIXNVDQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.90

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.48

+0.13

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is comparable to the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVIX and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVIX and NVDQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVIXNVDQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-99.45%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.79%

-68.07%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-99.27%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.59%

-88.31%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

63.76%

45.99%

+17.77%

Volatility

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) has a higher volatility of 33.83% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 26.09%. This indicates that UVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVIXNVDQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.83%

26.09%

+7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.07%

53.65%

+33.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.71%

70.45%

+42.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.06%

95.37%

+40.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.06%

95.37%

+40.69%

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVIX has a 2.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

UVIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.36%0.26%4.59%11.60%
UVIX
2x Long VIX Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UVIX and NVDQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVIX has higher volatility (33.83%) compared to NVDQ (26.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVIX dropped -99.98% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

On 1-year performance, NVDQ leads with -61.30% vs -84.89% for UVIX. On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 26.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDQ has performed better with a -61.30% return vs -84.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for UVIX.

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for UVIX.

UVIX is categorized as Volatility, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 2.78% for UVIX and 1.05% for NVDQ.

UVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVIX and NVDQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer