PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVIX vs. NVDQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVIX achieves a -51.51% return, which is significantly lower than NVDQ's -36.49% return.


UVIX

1D
1.47%
1M
-10.62%
6M
-51.93%
YTD
-51.51%
1Y
-84.06%
3Y*
-81.78%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.83%

NVDQ

1D
-5.83%
1M
-15.18%
6M
-36.15%
YTD
-36.49%
1Y
-51.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.93M$29.24M$55.86M
$103.60M$95.89M$153.43M

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UVIX
2x Long VIX Futures ETF
-51.51%-83.21%-75.24%-64.37%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
-36.49%-74.63%-93.80%-28.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UVIX and NVDQ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVIX vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UVIX
UVIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UVIXNVDQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.85

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-1.48

+0.09

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is comparable to the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVIX and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVIX and NVDQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVIXNVDQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-99.45%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.53%

-61.17%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-99.36%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.88%

-88.73%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.56%

34.95%

+25.61%

Volatility

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) has a higher volatility of 27.91% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 24.31%. This indicates that UVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVIXNVDQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.91%

24.31%

+3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.38%

57.28%

+28.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.56%

72.62%

+40.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

135.04%

94.74%

+40.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

135.04%

94.74%

+40.30%

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVIX has a 2.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

UVIX vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

UVIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.41%0.26%4.59%11.60%
UVIX
2x Long VIX Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UVIX and NVDQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVIX has higher volatility (27.91%) compared to NVDQ (24.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVIX dropped -99.98% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

On 1-year performance, NVDQ leads with -51.59% vs -84.06% for UVIX. On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDQ has performed better with a -51.59% return vs -84.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for UVIX.

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for UVIX.

UVIX is categorized as Volatility, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 2.78% for UVIX and 1.05% for NVDQ.

NVDQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVIX and NVDQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer