PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UUSTX vs. USAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (UUSTX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUSTX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, UUSTX has underperformed USAGX with an annualized return of 2.95%, while USAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


UUSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
2.95%

USAGX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-9.51%
1Y
51.88%
3Y*
40.64%
5Y*
19.10%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UUSTX
USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
1.39%5.25%6.20%5.57%-0.69%0.78%3.00%4.37%1.58%1.51%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-5.41%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UUSTX and USAGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2010

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UUSTX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUSTX
UUSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
UUSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UUSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (UUSTX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UUSTXUSAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.95

1.23

+1.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.67

1.49

+6.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.37

4.04

+33.33

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUSTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the USAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUSTX and USAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUSTX drawdown since its inception was -7.34%, smaller than the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUSTX and USAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UUSTXUSAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-80.89%

+73.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.59%

-36.13%

+35.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.59%

-36.13%

+35.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.53%

-45.72%

+43.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.34%

-51.03%

+43.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-29.20%

+29.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-43.06%

+42.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

13.29%

-13.17%

Volatility

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (UUSTX) is 0.43%, while USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a volatility of 16.09%. This indicates that UUSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UUSTXUSAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

16.09%

-15.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.05%

37.69%

-36.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47%

44.63%

-43.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.51%

33.31%

-31.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.51%

32.93%

-31.42%

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UUSTX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UUSTX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison

UUSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than USAGX's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.25%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%
UUSTX
USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
4.53%4.81%5.30%3.87%2.01%0.87%2.10%2.66%2.38%1.60%1.31%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


UUSTX and USAGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (16.09%) compared to UUSTX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUSTX dropped -7.34% vs USAGX's -80.89%.

UUSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UUSTX and USAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer