UUP vs. CSHI
UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) and CSHI (NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Neos. UUP is passively managed, while CSHI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UUP returned 4.21%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for CSHI. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. UUP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.
Performance
UUP vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UUP achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly higher than CSHI's 2.22% return.
UUP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UUP vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.70% | -4.99% | 13.50% | 3.63% | -3.69% |
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.22% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between UUP and CSHI is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022 | -0.09 |
The correlation between UUP and CSHI shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UUP vs. CSHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UUP
CSHI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
UUP
CSHI
Basic Materials
UUP
-
CSHI
Communication Services
UUP
-
CSHI
Consumer Cyclical
UUP
-
CSHI
Consumer Defensive
UUP
-
CSHI
Energy
UUP
-
CSHI
Healthcare
UUP
-
CSHI
Industrials
UUP
-
CSHI
Real Estate
UUP
-
CSHI
Technology
UUP
-
CSHI
Utilities
UUP
-
CSHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UUP vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank
UUP
CSHI
UUP vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UUP | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 2.61 | -1.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 25.71 | -24.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 141.38 | -137.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UUP | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 5.80 | -4.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 4.15 | -3.94 |
Drawdowns
UUP vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UUP drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUP and CSHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UUP | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -1.69% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -0.20% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.05% | -1.69% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -0.08% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -0.03% | -8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.04% | +1.33% |
Volatility
UUP vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) at 0.27%. This indicates that UUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UUP | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.27% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.25% | 0.57% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.09% | 0.89% | +5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 1.33% | +5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 1.33% | +5.63% |
UUP vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UUP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
UUP vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison
UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than CSHI's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.91% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.31% | 3.43% | 4.48% | 6.44% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 1.08% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UUP and CSHI have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UUP has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to CSHI (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUP dropped -22.19% vs CSHI's -1.69%.
On 3-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.40% vs 4.21% for UUP. On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.40% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.
CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 3.31% for UUP.
UUP is categorized as Currency, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUP and 0.38% for CSHI.
CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.80 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UUP and CSHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer