UUP vs. GC=F

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) is Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. Over the past 10 years, UUP returned 3.22%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for GC=F. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.

Performance

UUP vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and Gold Futures (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUP achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than GC=F's -5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, UUP has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 3.22%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.

UUP

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 4.92%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: 5.70%
• 10Y*: 3.22%
• ALL TIME*: 1.65%

GC=F

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.34%
• 6M: -13.05%
• YTD: -5.25%
• 1Y: 22.43%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 17.72%
• 10Y*: 11.63%
• ALL TIME*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GC=F Gold Futures	$116.79M	$56.64M	$28.60M
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	$55.14M	$58.68M	$59.16M

UUP vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	4.22%	-4.99%	13.50%	3.63%	9.46%	5.73%	-6.66%	4.09%	7.05%	-9.10%
GC=F Gold Futures	-5.25%	64.52%	27.48%	13.34%	-0.43%	-3.47%	24.59%	18.87%	-2.14%	13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between UUP and GC=F is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.40
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007	-0.39

Return for Risk

UUP vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UUP

UUP Risk / Return Rank: 32
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 28
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 38

GC=F

GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 3
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 0
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UUP vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UUP	GC=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.87	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	1.22	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.18	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	0.98	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.83	2.17	+1.67

UUP vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUP and GC=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UUP vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUP drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum GC=F drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUP and GC=F.

Drawdown Indicators

	UUP	GC=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-44.36%	+22.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-25.06%	+21.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.05%	-25.06%	+15.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.37%	-25.06%	+14.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.24%	-25.06%	+10.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-22.94%	+20.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-13.58%	+4.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	11.31%	-9.98%

Volatility

UUP vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) is 1.65%, while Gold Futures (GC=F) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that UUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UUP	GC=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	6.13%	-4.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.11%	23.41%	-19.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.88%	28.14%	-22.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.23%	18.65%	-11.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.89%	16.66%	-9.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UUP and GC=F in my portfolio?

UUP and GC=F have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UUP or GC=F?

GC=F has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to UUP (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUP dropped -22.19% vs GC=F's -44.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GC=F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.