PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTPIX vs. RMQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTPIX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than RMQHX's 38.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UTPIX has underperformed RMQHX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while RMQHX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.46% annualized return.


UTPIX

1D
-4.62%
1M
-11.48%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
8.20%

RMQHX

1D
1.16%
1M
19.81%
YTD
38.83%
6M
35.00%
1Y
84.57%
3Y*
50.69%
5Y*
26.53%
10Y*
37.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
-0.11%19.28%27.74%-15.46%-2.31%23.33%-8.87%34.24%2.30%15.83%
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
38.83%33.90%44.74%115.89%-59.96%56.33%101.06%80.70%-7.28%69.79%

Correlation

The correlation between UTPIX and RMQHX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.26

The correlation between UTPIX and RMQHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTPIX vs. RMQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTPIX
UTPIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UTPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
UTPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQHX
RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTPIXRMQHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

2.73

-2.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

3.18

-2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

3.47

-2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

12.59

-11.17

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the RMQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTPIX and RMQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTPIXRMQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.73

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.58

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.81

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.75

-0.52

Drawdowns

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTPIX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, which is greater than RMQHX's maximum drawdown of -63.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTPIX and RMQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTPIXRMQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.56%

-63.21%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.82%

-24.97%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

-42.46%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.73%

-63.21%

+24.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.82%

-63.21%

+12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.82%

0.00%

-14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-12.87%

-9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

6.89%

-0.35%

Volatility

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) is 7.63%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that UTPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTPIXRMQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

8.62%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.75%

24.34%

-6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

32.21%

-10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

46.22%

-20.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

46.44%

-17.38%

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQHX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTPIX vs. RMQHX - Dividend Comparison

UTPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than RMQHX's 25.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
25.05%34.77%25.22%3.66%0.00%2.13%5.17%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
0.77%0.77%0.00%1.74%0.97%0.20%0.58%1.72%0.66%0.74%0.83%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTPIX and RMQHX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMQHX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to UTPIX (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTPIX dropped -73.56% vs RMQHX's -63.21%.

RMQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTPIX and RMQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer