RMQHX vs. SMPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund (SMPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. SMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
SMPIX ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund | -5.24% | 56.35% | 81.41% | 155.37% | -54.31% | 80.17% | 60.77% | 77.97% | -17.56% | 42.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than SMPIX's -5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has underperformed SMPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while SMPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.30% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
SMPIX
- 1D
- 8.42%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -5.24%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 103.55%
- 3Y*
- 64.41%
- 5Y*
- 36.63%
- 10Y*
- 39.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SMPIX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. SMPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
SMPIX
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund (SMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | SMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.82 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.43 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.56 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 12.94 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | SMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.82 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.11 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.17 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.07 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and SMPIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than SMPIX's 13.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMPIX ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund | 13.73% | 13.02% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.57% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 40.03% | 0.11% | 0.45% | 0.68% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum SMPIX drawdown of -94.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and SMPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | SMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -94.09% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -22.78% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -94.09% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -94.09% | +30.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -84.58% | +65.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -57.42% | +44.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 8.03% | -0.72% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. SMPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) is 13.71%, while ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund (SMPIX) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that RMQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | SMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 16.71% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 36.99% | -10.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 58.76% | -10.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 332.54% | -286.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 237.08% | -190.72% |