UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO
UTIL.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both Utilities Equities funds. UTIL.TO is passively managed, while CINF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTIL.TO returned 15.05%/yr vs 16.72%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTIL.TO achieves a 19.94% return, which is significantly higher than CINF.TO's 17.91% return.
UTIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- YTD
- 19.94%
- 1Y
- 29.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 16.22%
- YTD
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- —
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTIL.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF | 19.94% | 19.08% | 8.82% | -1.83% | -11.68% |
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.91% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTIL.TO and CINF.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
UTIL.TO
CINF.TO
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF (UTIL.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTIL.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.42 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.38 | 4.15 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.66 | 12.29 | +5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.TO and CINF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTIL.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.61% | -12.27% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.62% | -5.31% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -9.62% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.35% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -2.05% | -5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.79% | -0.13% |
Volatility
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF (UTIL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) at 1.98%. This indicates that UTIL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTIL.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 1.98% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 7.78% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.65% | 9.55% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 11.96% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 12.08% | +0.38% |
Dividends
UTIL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
UTIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than CINF.TO's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.41% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% |
UTIL.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF | 3.35% | 4.07% | 4.38% | 4.45% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTIL.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and CI.
Find the right allocation for UTIL.TO and CINF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer