CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO
CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) and HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CINF.TO returned 12.72%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for HUTL.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINF.TO achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than HUTL.TO's 8.73% return.
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- —
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.12% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 5.03% | 13.56% | 7.55% |
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 8.73% | 15.59% | 14.70% | 3.11% | -4.97% | 16.04% | 5.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF.TO and HUTL.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CINF.TO
HUTL.TO
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINF.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.24 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.04 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 8.37 | +3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum HUTL.TO drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF.TO and HUTL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -34.00% | +21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -4.49% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -9.91% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.27% | -19.71% | +7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -4.39% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -6.61% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.62% | +0.17% |
Volatility
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) is 2.59%, while Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that CINF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 4.05% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 8.76% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 10.62% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 12.97% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 15.21% | -3.10% |
Dividends
CINF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than HUTL.TO's 7.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.42% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% | 0.00% |
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.86% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 6.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF.TO and HUTL.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for CINF.TO and HUTL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer