UTHY vs. BNDW
UTHY (US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF) and BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTHY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BNDW is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTHY returned -2.01%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for BNDW. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UTHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDW.
Performance
UTHY vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTHY achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 0.54% return.
UTHY
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- -2.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDW
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
UTHY vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | -0.07% | 3.47% | -8.07% | -2.67% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 0.54% | 5.02% | 2.42% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTHY and BNDW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between UTHY and BNDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTHY vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank
UTHY
BNDW
UTHY vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTHY | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.21 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 3.42 | -2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTHY | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.98 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.38 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
UTHY vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTHY drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTHY and BNDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTHY | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -17.22% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -2.70% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.58% | -4.27% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.19% | -1.42% | -9.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -4.98% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 0.96% | +1.96% |
Volatility
UTHY vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 1.31%. This indicates that UTHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTHY | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 1.31% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.22% | 2.63% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.41% | 3.36% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 5.21% | +8.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 4.90% | +8.75% |
UTHY vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTHY vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
UTHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than BNDW's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.12% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% |
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.53% | 4.58% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTHY and BNDW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTHY has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to BNDW (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTHY dropped -21.86% vs BNDW's -17.22%.
On 3-year performance, BNDW leads with 4.07% vs -2.01% for UTHY. On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BNDW has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BNDW has performed better with a 4.07% return vs -2.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTHY.
UTHY has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.21% for BNDW.
UTHY is categorized as Government Bonds, while BNDW is Global Bonds. UTHY tracks ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTHY and 0.05% for BNDW.
BNDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTHY and BNDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer