PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTF vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTF vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 11.56%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.


UTF

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
14.60%
6M
16.03%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.56%

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTF vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
14.60%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and USO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2006

0.23

The correlation between UTF and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTF vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTF vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTFUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.38

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

5.01

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

9.42

-7.17

UTF vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTFUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.31

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.68

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.10

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.18

+0.63

Drawdowns

UTF vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTFUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.62%

-98.19%

+25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-20.39%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-26.05%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.28%

-36.23%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.53%

-86.75%

+34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-85.01%

+83.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-75.30%

+64.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

10.82%

-5.77%

Volatility

UTF vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.78%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTFUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

14.87%

-12.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

38.23%

-29.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

44.20%

-31.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

36.06%

-17.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

39.00%

-15.63%

Dividends

UTF vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.98%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTF and USO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to UTF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs USO's -98.19%.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTF and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer