UTF vs. USO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) is a stock, while USO (United States Oil Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Over the past 10 years, UTF returned 11.49%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for USO. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

UTF vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 11.49%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.

UTF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 11.47%
• YTD: 20.28%
• 1Y: 14.01%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: 11.49%
• ALL TIME*: 11.16%

USO

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 24.23%
• 6M: 62.44%
• YTD: 86.77%
• 1Y: 66.76%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 20.59%
• 10Y*: 5.64%
• ALL TIME*: -6.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
USO United States Oil Fund LP	$968.42M	$871.56M	$931.57M
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	$6.45M	$6.34M	$7.48M

UTF vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	20.28%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	42.74%	-9.87%	34.10%
USO United States Oil Fund LP	86.77%	-8.46%	13.35%	-4.94%	28.97%	64.68%	-67.79%	32.61%	-19.57%	2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and USO is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2006	0.23

The correlation between UTF and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UTF vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 74
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 71

USO

USO Risk / Return Rank: 55
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTF vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTF	USO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.34	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.99	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.25	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.93	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.88	5.60	-2.72

UTF vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTF vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and USO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTF	USO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.62%	-98.19%	+25.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.33%	-32.49%	+22.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.00%	-32.49%	+13.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.28%	-36.23%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.53%	-86.75%	+34.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-86.26%	+85.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-75.38%	+65.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	12.03%	-6.98%

Volatility

UTF vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.59%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTF	USO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	17.73%	-15.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.98%	42.79%	-34.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.46%	46.91%	-34.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	37.06%	-18.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	39.29%	-15.99%

Dividends

UTF vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USO United States Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.82%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTF and USO in my portfolio?

UTF and USO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTF or USO?

USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to UTF (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs USO's -98.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.