PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTF vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTF vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.


UTF

1D
0.58%
1M
1.64%
6M
18.31%
YTD
19.78%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
11.44%

MUU

1D
-9.01%
1M
-18.36%
6M
372.65%
YTD
575.80%
1Y
2,796.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTF vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
19.78%9.93%-2.95%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
575.80%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and MUU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTF vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTF vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTFMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-22.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.69

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

66.09

-64.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

221.31

-218.53

UTF vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTF vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, roughly equal to the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTFMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.62%

-75.07%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-52.72%

+42.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-36.32%

+36.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.33%

-23.43%

+13.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

16.57%

-11.52%

Volatility

UTF vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 3.16%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.81%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTFMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

67.81%

-64.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

116.35%

-108.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

145.78%

-133.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

138.10%

-119.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.31%

138.10%

-114.79%

Dividends

UTF vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.70%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.76%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTF and MUU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (67.81%) compared to UTF (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs MUU's -75.07%.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTF and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer