PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTF vs. D
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTF vs. D - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Dominion Energy, Inc. (D). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than D's 14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed D with an annualized return of 11.45%, while D has yielded a comparatively lower 3.25% annualized return.


UTF

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.98%
YTD
15.84%
6M
18.47%
1Y
12.54%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
11.45%

D

1D
-2.06%
1M
6.92%
YTD
14.15%
6M
14.44%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
3.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTF vs. D - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
15.84%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%
D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
14.15%13.96%20.43%-19.13%-19.12%8.12%-5.35%21.50%-7.59%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and D is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2004

0.46

Fundamentals

EPS

UTF:

$6.79

D:

$3.67

PE Ratio

UTF:

3.99

D:

17.84

PEG Ratio

UTF:

0.03

D:

0.96

PS Ratio

UTF:

6.78

D:

2.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTF:

$387.16M

D:

$17.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTF:

$388.42M

D:

$6.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

UTF:

$765.72M

D:

$7.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTF vs. D — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

D
D Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
D Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
D Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
D Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
D Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTF vs. D - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Dominion Energy, Inc. (D). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.33

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

6.33

-3.85

UTF vs. D - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the D Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and D, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.09

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.06

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.14

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Drawdowns

UTF vs. D - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than D's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and D.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.62%

-52.20%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-9.77%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-26.41%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.28%

-52.20%

+21.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.53%

-52.20%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-9.67%

+9.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-9.58%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

3.59%

+1.46%

Volatility

UTF vs. D - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.67%, while Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) has a volatility of 11.14%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

11.14%

-8.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

16.66%

-8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

20.90%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

22.85%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

23.73%

-0.37%

Dividends

UTF vs. D - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than D's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
4.08%4.56%4.96%5.68%4.35%3.21%4.59%4.43%4.67%3.74%3.66%3.83%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.90%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Financials

UTF vs. D - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc and Dominion Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B202120222023202420252026
144.46M
5.02B
(UTF) Total Revenue
(D) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UTF and D have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

D has higher volatility (11.14%) compared to UTF (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs D's -52.20%.

D currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTF and D

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer