UTEN vs. BNDD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UTEN (US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. UTEN is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTEN returned 1.86%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for BNDD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UTEN charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.

Performance

UTEN vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.

UTEN

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: -1.30%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 1.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNDD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: -3.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTEN vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF	-0.69%	7.82%	-1.67%	3.18%	-7.79%
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	4.32%	-8.17%	-6.65%	4.02%	-8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between UTEN and BNDD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022	0.52

The correlation between UTEN and BNDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UTEN vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTEN

UTEN Risk / Return Rank: 22
UTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
UTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
UTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
UTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
UTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BNDD

BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 14
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTEN vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTEN	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.32	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	0.52	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.06	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	0.56	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.82	1.20	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTEN vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTEN and BNDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTEN	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	0.32	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-0.33	+0.33

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and BNDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTEN	BNDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	-30.87%	+17.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.57%	-6.09%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.60%	-20.75%	+12.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-26.51%	+23.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-19.34%	+14.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	2.83%	-1.32%

Volatility

UTEN vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is 1.71%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that UTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTEN	BNDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	2.21%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.65%	8.11%	-4.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.24%	10.59%	-5.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.05%	13.38%	-5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.05%	13.38%	-5.33%

UTEN vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTEN vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than BNDD's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	3.61%	3.82%	3.85%	4.30%	43.17%	1.04%
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF	4.05%	4.11%	4.13%	3.62%	1.39%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTEN and BNDD in my portfolio?

UTEN and BNDD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTEN or BNDD?

BNDD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to UTEN (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTEN dropped -13.36% vs BNDD's -30.87%.

Which ETF is better, UTEN or BNDD?

On 3-year performance, UTEN leads with 1.86% vs -3.91% for BNDD. On fees, UTEN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTEN has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UTEN or BNDD?

Over the 3-year period, UTEN has performed better with a 1.86% return vs -3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTEN or BNDD?

UTEN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTEN or BNDD?

UTEN has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.61% for BNDD.

What is the main difference between UTEN and BNDD?

They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTEN and 1.02% for BNDD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.