PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDD vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDD vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDD vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.22%-8.17%-6.65%4.02%-17.48%5.54%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
2.77%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%2.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDD achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 2.77% return.


BNDD

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.22%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
-4.63%
5Y*
10Y*

UUP

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.58%
YTD
2.77%
6M
4.43%
1Y
0.66%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDD vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDD has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNDD vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDD vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDDUUPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.41

0.09

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

0.17

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.02

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.13

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.56

0.24

-0.80

BNDD vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDD and UUP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDDUUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

0.09

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.20

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between BNDD and UUP is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

BNDD vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

BNDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than UUP's 3.34% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.64%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.34%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Drawdowns

BNDD vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDD drawdown since its inception was -30.87%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDD and UUP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDDUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-22.19%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-6.02%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.28%

-3.76%

-23.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-8.96%

-10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

3.20%

+4.06%

Volatility

BNDD vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 2.10%. This indicates that BNDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDDUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.10%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

4.17%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

7.41%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

7.24%

+6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.55%

6.99%

+6.56%