PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USVM vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USVM vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USVM vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%6.99%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and QQQA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.65

The correlation between USVM and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

USVM vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USVM
QQQA

Financial Services

22.0%

-

Industrials

12.1%

-

Real Estate

11.9%

-

Technology

11.6%
65.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
4.2%

Healthcare

11.0%
7.8%

Utilities

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.4%
9.1%

Communication Services

2.8%
13.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Financial Services

USVM
22.0%
QQQA

-

Industrials

USVM
12.1%
QQQA

-

Real Estate

USVM
11.9%
QQQA

-

Technology

USVM
11.6%
QQQA
65.2%

Consumer Cyclical

USVM
11.1%
QQQA
4.2%

Healthcare

USVM
11.0%
QQQA
7.8%

Utilities

USVM
6.4%
QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

USVM
5.0%
QQQA

-

Energy

USVM
4.4%
QQQA
9.1%

Communication Services

USVM
2.8%
QQQA
13.7%

Basic Materials

USVM
1.8%
QQQA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USVM vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USVM vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USVMQQQADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

3.41

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

4.00

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.54

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

6.11

-2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.76

22.85

-9.08

USVM vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USVMQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

3.41

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Drawdowns

USVM vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USVMQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.38%

-38.44%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-14.54%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-30.84%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-38.44%

+13.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-15.68%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.88%

-1.66%

Volatility

USVM vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 4.50%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USVMQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

10.17%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

22.18%

-11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

26.05%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

25.83%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

25.77%

-3.76%

USVM vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

USVM vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


USVM and QQQA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 9.74% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 9.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

USVM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USVM and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer