USVM vs. ONEO
USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) and ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) are both Momentum funds - USVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index while ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USVM returned 9.74%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for ONEO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USVM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ONEO.
Performance
USVM vs. ONEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than ONEO's 17.63% return.
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEO
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 6M
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
USVM vs. ONEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 17.63% | 10.61% | 15.01% | 15.64% | -12.01% | 26.72% | 10.76% | 26.53% | -12.41% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between USVM and ONEO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between USVM and ONEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
USVM vs. ONEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USVM
ONEO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
USVM
ONEO
Industrials
USVM
ONEO
Real Estate
USVM
ONEO
Technology
USVM
ONEO
Consumer Cyclical
USVM
ONEO
Healthcare
USVM
ONEO
Utilities
USVM
ONEO
Consumer Defensive
USVM
ONEO
Energy
USVM
ONEO
Communication Services
USVM
ONEO
Basic Materials
USVM
ONEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USVM vs. ONEO — Risk / Return Rank
USVM
ONEO
USVM vs. ONEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USVM | ONEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 2.23 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 3.19 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.84 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 15.26 | -1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USVM | ONEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.23 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.62 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.63 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
USVM vs. ONEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEO drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and ONEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USVM | ONEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -40.86% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -7.37% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -19.72% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | -22.39% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -5.00% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.86% | +0.36% |
Volatility
USVM vs. ONEO - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) at 3.85%. This indicates that USVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USVM | ONEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 3.85% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 9.69% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 12.84% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.22% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 18.66% | +3.35% |
USVM vs. ONEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
USVM vs. ONEO - Dividend Comparison
USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than ONEO's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.73% | 1.19% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 7.69% | 1.82% | 0.17% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, USVM and ONEO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to ONEO (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs ONEO's -40.86%.
On 5-year performance, ONEO leads with 10.60% vs 9.74% for USVM. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 9.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.
USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.20% for ONEO.
ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USVM and ONEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer