USVM vs. MTUM
USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - USVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USVM returned 10.06%/yr vs 15.18%/yr for MTUM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USVM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
USVM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return.
USVM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 32.00%
- 6M
- 29.92%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.49%
USVM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 18.75% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 32.00% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 4.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between USVM and MTUM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between USVM and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USVM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USVM
MTUM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
USVM
MTUM
Technology
USVM
MTUM
Industrials
USVM
MTUM
Real Estate
USVM
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
USVM
MTUM
Healthcare
USVM
MTUM
Utilities
USVM
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
USVM
MTUM
Energy
USVM
MTUM
Communication Services
USVM
MTUM
Basic Materials
USVM
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USVM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
USVM
MTUM
USVM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USVM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 3.64 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 13.91 | +0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USVM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USVM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -34.08% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -11.54% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -20.99% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | -32.28% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -4.48% | +4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -6.19% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.01% | -0.79% |
Volatility
USVM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 4.10%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USVM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 12.20% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 19.44% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 21.93% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 21.15% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 21.31% | +0.66% |
USVM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
USVM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.56% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USVM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to USVM (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.18% vs 10.06% for USVM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.
USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.15% for MTUM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USVM and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer