USVM vs. BSVO
USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway. USVM is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USVM returned 19.79%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for BSVO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USVM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
USVM vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BSVO
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USVM vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 21.13% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 18.09% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between USVM and BSVO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between USVM and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
USVM vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USVM
BSVO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
USVM
BSVO
Industrials
USVM
BSVO
Real Estate
USVM
BSVO
Technology
USVM
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
USVM
BSVO
Healthcare
USVM
BSVO
Utilities
USVM
BSVO
-
Consumer Defensive
USVM
BSVO
Energy
USVM
BSVO
Communication Services
USVM
BSVO
Basic Materials
USVM
BSVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USVM vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
USVM
BSVO
USVM vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USVM | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 2.21 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 3.14 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.99 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 14.22 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USVM | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.21 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.78 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
USVM vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USVM | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -28.67% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -8.31% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -28.67% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -1.86% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -5.73% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.91% | -0.69% |
Volatility
USVM vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 4.50%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USVM | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 4.77% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 11.95% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 18.88% | -3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 21.72% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 21.72% | +0.29% |
USVM vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
USVM vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than BSVO's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, USVM and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, USVM leads with 19.79% vs 18.56% for BSVO. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USVM has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 18.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.
USVM is categorized as Momentum, while BSVO is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USVM and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer