PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UST vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UST vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, UST has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of -2.13%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.


UST

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-4.24%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
-0.51%
5Y*
-6.75%
10Y*
-2.13%

UGA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
75.49%
6M
64.35%
1Y
80.94%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UST vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
-2.88%10.26%-6.19%0.16%-30.19%-7.81%18.83%13.34%-1.09%3.21%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
75.49%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between UST and UGA is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010

-0.18

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UST and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.18 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UST vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UST
UST Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UST Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UST Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UST vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

5.47

-5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

13.25

-11.99

UST vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UST Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UST and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.32

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.73

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.39

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.12

+0.07

Drawdowns

UST vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-86.59%

+38.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-14.88%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-26.68%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-38.11%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.99%

-75.89%

+27.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.33%

-12.35%

-25.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-36.76%

+21.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

6.13%

-3.10%

Volatility

UST vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) is 3.10%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that UST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

11.66%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

30.41%

-23.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

35.14%

-25.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

34.38%

-18.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

37.27%

-24.09%

UST vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UST vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
3.49%3.65%4.09%3.49%0.47%0.27%0.53%1.42%1.71%0.84%0.64%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


UST and UGA have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to UST (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs -2.13% for UST. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UST has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UST.

UST has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

UST is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. UST tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UST and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UST and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer