UST vs. FLXR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UST (ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury) and FLXR (TCW Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UST is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while FLXR is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW. UST is passively managed, while FLXR is actively managed. Over the past year, UST returned 3.81% vs 5.89% for FLXR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UST charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FLXR.

Performance

UST vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than FLXR's 1.09% return.

UST

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: -2.88%
• 6M: -4.24%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: -0.51%
• 5Y*: -6.75%
• 10Y*: -2.13%

FLXR

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 1.43%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UST vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UST ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury	-2.88%	10.26%	-1.78%
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	1.09%	8.37%	4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between UST and FLXR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.73

The correlation between UST and FLXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

UST vs. FLXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UST	FLXR
Financial Services	97.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	62.4%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	37.6%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UST vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UST

UST Risk / Return Rank: 14
UST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
UST Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
UST Omega Ratio Rank: 13
UST Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
UST Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FLXR

FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 82
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UST vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UST	FLXR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	2.61	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	3.94	-3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.51	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	4.04	-3.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.26	17.36	-16.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UST vs. FLXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UST Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FLXR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UST and FLXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UST	FLXR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	2.61	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	2.65	-2.46

Drawdowns

UST vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and FLXR.

Drawdown Indicators

	UST	FLXR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.99%	-1.94%	-46.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-1.46%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.33%	-0.23%	-38.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.13%	-0.36%	-14.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	0.34%	+2.69%

Volatility

UST vs. FLXR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) at 0.76%. This indicates that UST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UST	FLXR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	0.76%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.58%	1.65%	+4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	2.26%	+7.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	2.79%	+12.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.18%	2.79%	+10.39%

UST vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

UST vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison

UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FLXR's 5.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	5.82%	5.66%	3.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UST ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury	3.49%	3.65%	4.09%	3.49%	0.47%	0.27%	0.53%	1.42%	1.71%	0.84%	0.64%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UST and FLXR in my portfolio?

UST and FLXR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UST or FLXR?

UST has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to FLXR (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs FLXR's -1.94%.

Which ETF is better, UST or FLXR?

On 1-year performance, FLXR leads with 5.89% vs 3.81% for UST. On fees, FLXR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FLXR has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UST or FLXR?

Over the 1-year period, FLXR has performed better with a 5.89% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UST or FLXR?

FLXR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UST or FLXR?

FLXR has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 3.49% for UST.

What is the main difference between UST and FLXR?

UST is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FLXR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UST and 0.40% for FLXR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.