USSG vs. SCHG
USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - USSG tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USSG returned 13.00%/yr vs 13.26%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USSG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
USSG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.23% return.
USSG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 22.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
USSG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 7.35% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.23% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSG and SCHG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between USSG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
USSG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USSG
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
USSG
SCHG
Communication Services
USSG
SCHG
Financial Services
USSG
SCHG
Healthcare
USSG
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
USSG
SCHG
Industrials
USSG
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
USSG
SCHG
Energy
USSG
SCHG
Real Estate
USSG
SCHG
Basic Materials
USSG
SCHG
Utilities
USSG
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
USSG
SCHG
USSG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USSG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.18 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 0.98 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 3.19 | +5.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USSG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -34.59% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -16.41% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -23.39% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -34.59% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -6.57% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -5.20% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 5.03% | -2.37% |
Volatility
USSG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) is 5.28%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that USSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 5.90% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 12.46% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 16.21% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 22.38% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 21.58% | -1.42% |
USSG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USSG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, USSG and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to USSG (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.26% vs 13.00% for USSG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USSG.
USSG has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.04% for SCHG.
USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USSG and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer