PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHH's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has outperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 6.03%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.


USRT

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.64%
6M
16.77%
YTD
20.27%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
6.03%
ALL TIME*
5.55%

SCHH

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.87%
6M
14.82%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
3.73%
ALL TIME*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$134.76M$145.46M$140.74M
$30.77M$33.55M$34.12M

USRT vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
20.27%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
17.68%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and SCHH is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.97

The correlation between USRT and SCHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USRT vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USRTSCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.37

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

7.96

+2.47

USRT vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USRT vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTSCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-44.22%

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.28%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-17.76%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-33.28%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-44.22%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-2.33%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-9.36%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.47%

-0.10%

Volatility

USRT vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTSCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.56%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

10.96%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

13.92%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.79%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.34%

21.03%

+0.31%

USRT vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USRT vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than SCHH's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.72%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.51%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, USRT and SCHH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USRT has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to SCHH (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

On 10-year performance, USRT leads with 6.03% vs 3.73% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USRT has performed better with a 6.03% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USRT.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.51% for USRT.

USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.07% for SCHH.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer