USNG vs. BATT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT).

USNG and BATT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USNG is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on May 19, 2025. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.

Performance

USNG vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

USNG vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	19.70%	10.81%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	8.99%	60.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNG achieves a 19.70% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 8.99% return.

USNG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 19.70%
• 6M: 17.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -7.16%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 82.30%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNG vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USNG and BATT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

USNG

Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF

Return for Risk

USNG vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNG vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USNG	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.41	-0.05	+2.45

Correlation

The correlation between USNG and BATT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

USNG vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than BATT's 1.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.24%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.70%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%

Drawdowns

USNG vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNG	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-69.38%	+62.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.02%	-15.47%	+11.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-35.40%	+34.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USNG	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	32.28%	-16.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	29.24%	-13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	30.55%	-14.38%