USNG vs. BITY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USNG is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, USNG returned 32.07% vs -43.57% for BITY. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. USNG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.

Performance

USNG vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNG achieves a 25.43% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -26.11% return.

USNG

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 12.87%
• YTD: 25.43%
• 1Y: 32.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.38%

BITY

• 1D: -2.83%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: -23.81%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 1Y: -43.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	$100.16K	$157.87K	$174.55K
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	$437.77K	$274.58K	$158.86K

USNG vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	25.43%	10.51%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-26.11%	-17.28%

Correlation

The correlation between USNG and BITY is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

USNG vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 76
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USNG vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USNG	BITY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	-1.10	+2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	-1.66	+4.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.82	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	-0.90	+3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.67	-1.40	+12.07

USNG vs. BITY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the BITY Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNG and BITY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USNG vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -50.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and BITY.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNG	BITY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-50.87%	+38.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-50.87%	+38.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	-47.63%	+39.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-23.13%	+21.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	32.54%	-29.61%

Volatility

USNG vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) is 6.49%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that USNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNG	BITY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	9.22%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	31.63%	-17.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	41.58%	-24.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	39.00%	-21.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	39.00%	-21.71%

USNG vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNG vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than BITY's 37.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	37.67%	21.53%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.54%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNG and BITY in my portfolio?

USNG and BITY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNG or BITY?

BITY has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to USNG (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNG dropped -11.93% vs BITY's -50.87%.

Which ETF is better, USNG or BITY?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 32.07% vs -43.57% for BITY. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, USNG has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USNG or BITY?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 32.07% return vs -43.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USNG or BITY?

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USNG or BITY?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 37.67%, compared with 1.54% for USNG.

What is the main difference between USNG and BITY?

USNG is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for USNG and 0.65% for BITY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.