USMV vs. SELV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USMV is passively managed, while SELV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USMV returned 11.43%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for SELV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

USMV vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USMV having a 4.64% return and SELV slightly higher at 4.65%.

USMV

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

SELV

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 1Y: 10.70%
• 3Y*: 11.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	4.64%	7.65%	15.74%	10.33%	0.21%
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	4.65%	12.86%	14.71%	6.58%	-0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and SELV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.93

The correlation between USMV and SELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

USMV vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USMV	SELV
Technology	33.9%	21.4%
Healthcare	12.6%	17.0%
Financial Services	11.7%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.4%	12.3%
Utilities	6.9%	7.6%
Communication Services	6.2%	15.8%
Industrials	6.1%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	4.9%
Energy	2.7%	4.3%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.1%
Basic Materials	2.4%	2.8%

Return for Risk

USMV vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV

USMV Risk / Return Rank: 28
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SELV

SELV Risk / Return Rank: 41
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USMV	SELV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.16	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.71	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.81	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	4.84	-1.23

USMV vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USMV vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and SELV.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMV	SELV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-13.73%	-19.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-5.92%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.36%	-8.94%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.34%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-2.37%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.21%	-0.24%

Volatility

USMV vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.54%, while SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMV	SELV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	3.86%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.22%	7.24%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.48%	9.26%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	11.90%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.49%	11.90%	+2.59%

USMV vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USMV and SELV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USMV vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than SELV's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	1.71%	1.74%	1.77%	2.06%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.48%	1.49%	1.67%	1.82%	1.62%	1.26%	1.81%	1.88%	2.12%	1.77%	2.22%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMV and SELV in my portfolio?

USMV and SELV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMV or SELV?

SELV has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to USMV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs SELV's -13.73%.

Which ETF is better, USMV or SELV?

On 3-year performance, SELV leads with 11.44% vs 11.43% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMV or SELV?

Over the 3-year period, SELV has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMV or SELV?

USMV and SELV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMV or SELV?

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.48% for USMV.

What is the main difference between USMV and SELV?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and SEI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.