USMV vs. QQQ
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.90%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for QQQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
USMV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.90%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.
USMV
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
USMV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.43% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and QQQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and QQQ has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USMV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
USMV
QQQ
Healthcare
USMV
QQQ
Financial Services
USMV
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
USMV
QQQ
Utilities
USMV
QQQ
Communication Services
USMV
QQQ
Industrials
USMV
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
QQQ
Energy
USMV
QQQ
Basic Materials
USMV
QQQ
Real Estate
USMV
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
QQQ
USMV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 3.01 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 11.22 | -9.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -82.97% | +49.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -11.96% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -22.77% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -35.12% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | -35.12% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -3.33% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -32.75% | +29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.20% | -1.25% |
Volatility
USMV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.70%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 7.56% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 13.81% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.56% | 17.19% | -8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 22.55% | -10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 22.38% | -7.87% |
USMV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to USMV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 9.90% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer