PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. IUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.


USMV

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.61%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.93%

IUS

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.89%
YTD
15.71%
6M
15.69%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.65%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%-7.13%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
15.71%16.94%16.51%20.79%-8.34%32.17%15.09%29.34%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and IUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.75

The correlation between USMV and IUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMV vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
IUS

Technology

30.8%
22.4%

Healthcare

12.5%
12.8%

Financial Services

12.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
7.4%

Utilities

7.5%
1.0%

Communication Services

5.9%
14.7%

Industrials

5.7%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.7%

Energy

3.6%
10.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.5%

Technology

USMV
30.8%
IUS
22.4%

Healthcare

USMV
12.5%
IUS
12.8%

Financial Services

USMV
12.4%
IUS
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

USMV
10.0%
IUS
7.4%

Utilities

USMV
7.5%
IUS
1.0%

Communication Services

USMV
5.9%
IUS
14.7%

Industrials

USMV
5.7%
IUS
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
IUS
10.7%

Energy

USMV
3.6%
IUS
10.9%

Basic Materials

USMV
2.2%
IUS
3.3%

Real Estate

USMV
2.2%
IUS
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS
IUS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMVIUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.60

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

5.44

-4.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

23.27

-21.00

USMV vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMVIUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

3.26

-2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.91

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.85

+0.02

Drawdowns

USMV vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, roughly equal to the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and IUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVIUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-34.67%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-6.15%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-15.61%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-18.72%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.07%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-3.86%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.43%

+0.50%

Volatility

USMV vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) have volatilities of 2.38% and 2.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVIUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

2.50%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

7.41%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

10.26%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

15.00%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.04%

-3.53%

USMV vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than IUS's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
1.28%1.48%1.52%1.72%1.78%1.46%1.74%1.77%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and IUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUS has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to USMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs IUS's -34.67%.

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 7.45% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.28% for IUS.

USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.19% for IUS.

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and IUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer